EFFECTIVE ACTION MUST BE TAKEN BEFORE THEY GET UPPERHAND

A year after restoring ties between North Korea and Burma, news of North Korean vessel calling to Rangoon port leaked out. The Korean ships reportedly unloaded arms and other equipments to be used for military purpose. It loaded rice and other agricultural products and left the port for home. Later, General Shwemann of Burmese Armed Forces visited Pyongyang. Thus, the relationship between Burma and North Korea further strengthen and the two countries have established a new chapter that will not welcome by Burmese people as well as the peace-loving world communities. Burma's military regime and North Korea have secretly engaging a mutual benefit business that can lead to both regional and global threat and this become an important issue as the political analysts point out citing information gathered by investigative reporters who are in pursuit of the Korean-Burmese secret movement. What are the mutual benefit that will be resulted from their cooperation? It is obvious that military regime in Burma will get the missiles and arm-producing technology from North Korea and in return North Korea will get food and refined uranium that imported from Russia by the regime. As the stubborn and cunning North Korea never pay heed to the UN resolution to refrain from testing missile and secretly developing atomic bomb, peace-lovers around the globe will not tolerate when learning that North Korea and Burma are secretly running a project that is threatening the world. The world body and the world communities must take action on the axis- of- evil countries (North Korea, Burma and Iran) before they get upperhand to destroy the world.
NORTH KOREAN TUNNELLERS FORTIFY BURMA JUNTA
(An article appeared in TIMEONLINE, July 4, 2009, contributed by Michael Sheridan)
The first strangers appeared some time ago in the jungles of Arakan, in northern Burma, mystifying the villagers whose lives revolved around their golden temples and their crops.
The older people thought they might be Japanese, remembering those who had fought against the British during the second world war for every inch of this monsoon-drenched land, but their language sounded harsher.
In fact, they were North Korean engineers building a complex of tunnels and bunkers for the Burmese military junta in an axis of outcasts.
More North Koreans were soon being seen — and even photographed by a daring local person — around Naypyidaw, the junta’s isolated new capital, where they oversaw labour gangs excavating a subterranean complex.
A third group of North Koreans has now been spotted in Chin state, bordering India and Bangladesh, an area full of restive minorities where few tourists venture. They are said to be equipping tunnels with generators and anti-gas ventilation systems.
Eventually the junta is to have a web of underground command posts, linked by fibreoptic cables, to help it put down any revolt and keep control in a national emergency, according to exiles from Burma and diplomats in Rangoon.
The North Koreans have sold similar services in the past to Saddam Hussein’s Iraq as well as to Iran and Syria.
One report suggested that some sections of tunnels in Burma were wide enough for trucks and could accommodate 600 personnel for several months, with storage space for food and weaponry.
Tunnelling is a military engineering skill that the North Koreans have perfected while honeycombing their fortress homeland with underground hangars and shelters against air or missile bombardment.
The North Koreans also specialise in air defence systems and radar. Their own installations were good enough to spot a Japanese electronic warfare aircraft taking off from its base in Honshu last month and to track its flight path all the way to the North Korean coast.
Such expertise has made them natural partners for the Burmese military, which shares their preoccupations with domestic security and foreign threats.
Yet it was only the presence of the North Korean workers that told Burmese onlookers of a secret relationship that has deepened as the two regimes have been pushed closer by international sanctions.

After exiles posted photographs on the internet, Burmese intelligence launched a "huge investigation" that led to the arrests of several journalists and the dismissal of senior officers, according to The Nation, a Thai newspaper. It quoted Thai intelligence officers, who watch Burma closely, confirming the existence of the tunnels.
The new alliance has required the leaders of Burma and North Korea to forget the bloody events of 1983, when a team of terrorists acting on the orders of Kim Jong-il blew up a ceremony welcoming the South Korean cabinet to Rangoon, killing 22 people, including ministers.
Since 2007, when the two re-established diplomatic relations after a 24-year break, shipping agents have noted a steady stream of vessels calling at the port of Thilawa.
The two pariah nations, all but cut off from global trade, appear to have agreed on a barter system. The North Korean ships have unloaded heavy equipment and wooden crates. Although dockside workers could not read the markings, they appeared to be military consignments, probably small arms and ammunition.
In return, the Burmese labourers piled rice, rubber, hardwood and rare minerals into the holds. Burma is rich in ores, including uranium.
Another advantage for North Korea is that goods can be transferred in Burmese ports to ships destined for Iran, frustrating attempts by the United States and its allies to watch and perhaps intercept military shipments.
Last week a mysterious North Korean ship, the Kang Nam 1, reversed course and steamed homewards after being trailed by an American Aegis-class destroyer, the USS John McCain, on a suspected voyage to Burma.
The CIA is principally concerned with perhaps the strangest of all Burma’s projects — its plan to operate a nuclear research reactor supplied by Rosatom, a Russian company, under an agreement announced in May 2007.
The reactor will be similar to North Korea’s plant at Yongbyon, which has been used to make plutonium for Kim’s nuclear bombs.
At least 350 Burmese, most of them military personnel, have received training in Russia and exiles reported that 80 others went to North Korea for instruction.
"I have to say it is childish of the Burmese generals to dream about acquiring nuclear technology since they can’t even provide regular electricity in Burma," said Thakhin Chan Tun, a former Burmese ambassador to Pyongyang, in an interview with The Irrawaddy, an exile magazine.
Than Shwe, the elderly junta leader, is not playing, however. A 37-page report leaked to Radio Free Asia reveals details of a visit to North Korea last November by a military delegation. It was led by the third man in his regime, Thura Shwe Mann, the army chief of staff.
The report describes how the 17-man Burmese group agreed to co-operate on training, special forces operations and "the building of tunnels for aircraft and ships as well as other underground military installations".
The alliance has also helped to fortify Than Shwe’s political will. This weekend he turned down a personal appeal from Ban Ki-moon, the United Nations secretary-general, to free all political prisoners including Aung San Suu Kyi, the opposition leader.
North Korea launched seven short-range ballistic missiles yesterday in defiance of United Nations resolutions. They travelled for about 250 miles before falling into the sea.




































































































































































































































DPRK-BURMA SECRET COOPERATION, A THREATENING TO THE WORLD?

June 24, 2009 (DVB)–New images have emerged that show North Korean and other foreign advisers in Burma consulting with officials on what now appears to be an extensive network of some 800 underground tunnels across much of the country.
While rife government corruption and uneven development in Burma yesterday awarded Burma a spot at the bottom of Foreign Policy magazine’s Failed States Index, billions of US dollars are now known to have been channeled by the Burmese government into building the tunnels.
DVB has been tracking the development of the tunnels and underground installations in Burma for a number of years. This is the first in a series of DVB stories revealing the secretive tunnel project.
Evidence has been obtained that shows between 600 and 800 tunnels in various stages of construction, with work on some sections dating as far back as 1996.
Photographs of a number of tunnel sites clearly show North Korean advisers present. In one photograph of a work site at Pyinmanar Taung Nyo, dated 29 May 2006, North Korean advisers are seen training Burmese soldiers and technicians in tunnel construction.
Several government budget files also show evidence of foreign aid and loans being used to fund construction work.
A number of senior Burmese officials have been dismissed in recent days following the first publication of DVB’s tunnel photographs in the Yale Global Online on 8 June.
The military government has launched an investigation into how details of such a sensitive project were leaked, with associates of former intelligence chief Lieutenant General Khin Nyunt being questioned by police.
Further intelligence documents obtained by DVB show that the tunnel system is being disguised by the government as a fibre optic cable installation project.
Leaked engineering designs show, however, that some sections of the tunnels are wide enough to allow trucks to enter and leave. There is also storage space for food and weaponry, and separate rooms that would hold around 600 personnel for several months.
The documents also reveal plans to hold large rockets and satellite communication command centers inside the tunnels.
Although the financially weak Burmese government is thought to allocate some 40 per cent of its budget for military purposes, the tunnel project over the course of 13 years has likely run into the billions.
Some observers have speculated that the abrupt hike in fuel prices that sparked the September 2007 protests may have been a prelude to securing extra capital for the project.
Likewise, Burma struck a deal with China in April this year to siphon its vast offshore natural gas reserves to China’s energy hungry population, a venture that will have given the tunnel project an important boost.
Speculation that Burma is trading in military hardware with North Korea was reinforced on Monday with reports that a North Korean freighter ship believed to be carrying arms was headed in the direction of Burma.
Despite only reestablishing diplomatic ties in 2007, following North Korea’s bombing of a South Korean delegation in Rangoon in 1983, the two countries share characteristics that make them obvious allies.
According to journalist and expert on North Korea-Burma relations, Bertil Lintner, both countries have "absolutely no interest" in supporting respective UN arms embargoes.
Indeed, North Korea is one of the few countries willing to continue military trade with the pariah state, with "even China…reluctant to sell certain types of equipment to Burma", according to Lintner.
Perhaps most worryingly for countries outside of Burma’s friendship group, it has renewed an alliance with a country that is rapidly becoming the icon of a new generation of ‘rogue states’ threatening nuclear warfare.
With this in mind, speculation will likely start to circulate as to whether the tunnel network could be linked to rumours that Burma is mining uranium ore, a key ingredient for nuclear fission. No evidence has yet appeared to verify this, however.
In our next story we will reveal the purpose of these tunnels, foreign involvement in the project and what is inside the tunnels.

FREE OUR DEMOCRATIC LEADER



(Editorial of Irrawaddy online news magazine, 28 June, 2009)

The removal of Aung San Suu Kyi from her home to Rangoon’s infamous Insein Prison and her trial before a secret court have sparked international outrage and condemnation, shared by world leaders, Nobel Prize winners and prominent personalities.
Two governments have remained significantly silent, however—those of Burma’s two giant neighbors, China and India.
The reasons for their silence aren’t difficult to discern.
Both countries exploit Burma’s natural resources and are major trading partners. China, in particular, profits from lively arms sales to the pariah regime.
China makes no secret of its strong ties with Burma. New Delhi, on the other hand, is a pathetic hypocrite, changing its policy from support for Suu Kyi to one of subservience to Burma’s ruling generals. India has descended a long and ignoble decline since presenting Suu Kyi with its coveted Jawaharlal Nehru Award.
It’s sad indeed to see one of the world’s largest democracies—whose commitment to democracy has just been proved in a general election—kowtowing to the bullies of Naypyidaw.
It’s sad indeed to see one of the world’s largest democracies—whose commitment to democracy has just been proved in a general election—kowtowing to the bullies of Naypyidaw.
China’s stance on Burma is, by comparison, at least intriguing.
At the time of the September 2007 demonstrations, when monks and other protesters were gunned down in the streets of Rangoon, China told Burma to exercise restraint. Beijing urged the junta to restore order quickly and to address the domestic tensions that caused the unrest.
Although the regime ignored the appeals from Beijing, China remained on friendly terms with Naypidaw and used its UN veto to block a Security Council resolution on Burma in 2007.
Beijing is not blind, however, to Burma’s ongoing problems. Chinese analysts and officials have been meeting exiled Burmese and making assessments on Burma. They have suggested that Beijing is wary of political development in Burma.
China has also told the Burmese regime that it doesn’t share Naypyidaw’s description of Suu Kyi as a tool of the West, and has indicated strongly that it wants to see national reconciliation in Burma.
When Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi visited Burma in December, he urged junta leader Snr-Gen Than Shwe to respect the UN’s request for an inclusive political process in Burma, and he reportedly mentioned political prisoners, including Suu Kyi.
Informed sources in Naypyidaw suggested that Than Shwe looked unhappy, while briefing his Chinese visitor on the state of the country, including its political and economic development and reconstruction work in the cyclone-hit Irrawaddy delta.
It is sad that Burmese leaders have found in China a convenient shield to hide behind whenever they face international outrage and condemnation. Again, the silence emanating from Beijing only sent a wrong signal to Than Shwe.
As in September 2007, Beijing should speak out. But this time it should exercise its political influence not only on Burma but also on the region as a whole to press for the release of Suu Kyi and the other political prisoners.
Such a move by China would be warmly welcomed by oppressed Burmese and the exiled community. It shouldn’t be forgotten that they also want to regard China as a friend.

SAY NO TO 2010 ELECTION


From ‘People’s Army’ to ‘Enemy of the People'
(An article from Mizzima news)

by Tettoe Aung
Thursday, 26 March 2009 16:27

As Hegel said, “The only lesson we learn from history is that we do not learn from history.” One thing for sure, is that we Burmese have not learned from the proud history of our military. The founder of our military, Bogyoke Aung San, stated in unambiguous terms that the Burmese army (Tatmadaw) had not been founded for one man or one party, but rather for the whole country. He rejected the view of those military personnel who harbored the opinion that only they were capable of patriotism.Those that subscribed to the more narrow definition of patriotism branded people who dared to disagree with them as ‘axe handles’. If someone was married to a non-Burmese or a foreigner, like Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, he or she would be disowned.The military’s view that they are the only ones capable of patriotism is made explicit every March 27th, when they celebrate the once-called ‘Revolutionary Day’ as their exclusive ‘Armed Forces Day’. With the general public kept away from the ceremonies, it seems to have never occurred to them that there are others who are not soldiers who have suffered and made all kinds of sacrifices for their country.The irony is that the military, unlike celestial beings, are not born out of thin air. They are the offspring - sons and daughters - of the people whom they have chosen to turn against. Unlike the founding father, Bogyoke Aung San, the military under Ne Win and his successors, Saw Maung and now Than Shwe, has been indoctrinated to believe that they are above the people whom they are supposed to serve. For them, only the soldiers matter.As an article published in The Irrawaddy about the ‘military mindset’ noted, the underlining rationale in military training is to make a person immediately act or follow orders without thinking. There is no time for them to think whether their actions are right or wrong. Such a mentality was clearly on display in September 2007, as a young, Burmese soldier shot dead a Japanese cameraman at point blank range. And even if foot soldiers rise in rank to serve as officers or generals, still the lack of rational thought prevails.A study in ‘Killology’ by Colonel David Grossman shows that the training methods a military uses are brutalization, classical conditioning, operant conditioning and role-modeling. He writes: “Brutalization and desensitizing is what happens at the boot camp. From the moment you step off the bus you are physically and verbally abused. Your head is shaved, you are herded together naked, and dressed alike, losing all vestiges of individuality. This brutalization is designed to break down your existing mores and norms and to accept a new set of values which embrace destruction, violence and death as a way of life. In the end you are desensitized to violence and accept it as a normal and essential survival skill in your brutal new world.”When it comes to ‘classical conditioning’ Grossman says, “The Japanese were masters at using classical conditioning with their soldiers." Let us not forget the fact that the Burmese military was founded with the help of the Imperial Japanese military during the War. I recall how one of my relatives, trained to be an officer under the Japanese, himself became a Director of Training, incorporating similar methods of indoctrination to that of the Japanese. As for myself, I wasn't cut out for that and even my three month training at Phaung-gyi is something that I still feel disgusted about every time I recall the experience.The Burmese military may have been founded out of necessity as an institution, but reason says that institutions, the military included, are created to provide service for humanity, not to advance the personal interests of those mandated to serve. In the same vein, Zhuge Liang wrote, “When offices are chosen for persons, there is disorder; when persons are chosen for offices, there is order.”Yet, the Tatmadaw will continue to parade on March 27th of this year just as they always do, marching merely for themselves and not, as it should be, for the people.

Lawless country and barbarious rulers


Security force member: "You are under arrest because you have changed the contents of our three main causes."
Lady in front of the signboard: "I do not change it. Maybe someone rewrite it. Can't I read it?"

Security force member: "No, no. You are under arrest because you are reading what is not an official motto of our military government. "

OBAMA ON BURMESE MILY. REGIME

"TO THOSE WHO CLING TO POWER THROUGH CORRUPTION AND DECEIT AND THE SILENCING OF DISSENT, KNOW THAT YOU ARE ON THE WRONG SIDE OF HISTORY, BUT THAT WE WILL EXTEND A HAND IF YOU ARE WILLING TO UNCLENCH YOUR FIST."

RESULT OF THE LAST ELECTION













NEW YEAR (2009) RESOLUTION

First, through a concerted, non-violent protest by all citizens of the country at home and international fora. If it is responded by repression and harsher measures, then, through an armed revolution. Such moves are sure to be supported by all democratic and peace loving countries of the world. (modest)Add Image

EXIT 2008 ENTER 2009




Exit 2008 without any fruitful result for Burma. The world body cannot do anything to get rid of the military regime in Burma. Nor the people and religious monks who had taken to streets in September 2007. Another bloodshed in the troubled country and many more to come in the near future. The new year 2009 ushered in but the country is still under the boots of merciless military regime. Run by a handful of top brass, the country is still in the list of poorest countries of the world. However, by robbing, bribing and confiscating properties of people the ruling generals have turned themselves into billioners overnight. While the top generals are accumulating their wealth when time is ripe and during power is in their hands, poor people become poorer than before. Now the unscrupulous group and criminals of the century again preparing for the next election which is to be held in 2010 nationwide. Another cheating game. People have enough bluffing stories and they are undoubtedly fed up of going to the poll stations if the elections is going to take place as scheduled by the regime. They believe that only the army will going to take power again whoever win the coming elections and nothing will be changed for the country and people. The military regime has tried every means and ways to erase the internationally recognized election result of 1990. It even attempted to assassinate the democratic icon Daw Aung San Suu Kyi. It hamper party activities of NLD that are in accordance with the rule of National Election Commission. The regime arrested hundreds of protester who participated in the Saffron Revolution that took place in September 2007. Many are sentenced up to 60 years meaning that they are going to rule for the next 60 years. Are they going to rule?


Former World Leaders Rally for Burma’s Political Prisoners,
Call for UN Action
(OSI News Coverage: December 3, 2008)

In recent weeks, the Burmese military has sentenced over 200 students and labor activists, Cyclone Nargis relief workers, monks—and even their lawyers—to draconian prison terms. The venerable U Gambira, a leading monk of last year’s popular protests, was sentenced to 68 years.

The Soros foundations network partnered with grantees and the Oslo Center for Peace and Human Rights and Freedom to garner presidential signatures calling for the release of Aung San Suu Kyi and all political prisoners currently being held by Burma’s junta. Over 100 former presidents and prime ministers representing more than 50 countries wrote to the United Nations Secretary General, Ban Ki-moon: “If the Burmese junta continues to defy the United Nations by refusing to make these releases by the end of the year, we urge you to encourage the Security Council to take further concrete action to implement its call for the release of all political prisoners.

Letter to UNSG

Mr. Ban Ki-moon
Secretary-General
United Nations
New York, New York

Dear Mr. Secretary-General:

We write this letter to applaud your public consideration of traveling to Burma, also known as Myanmar, before the end of the year. We encourage this trip because it would illustrate for the world whether or not the Burmese military regime is serious about making changes called for by the United Nations Security Council and your good offices.
As you are aware, on October 11, 2007, the United Nations Security Council issued a presidential statement calling on the Burmese military junta to release all political prisoners in Burma, including the world’s only imprisoned Nobel Peace Prize Laureate, Aung San Suu Kyi.
We are heartened that you have taken up this issue and reiterated in your budget request for your Special Envoy's office to the UN General Assembly that a key benchmark to measure progress in Burma is whether all political prisoners in Burma, including Aung San Suu Kyi, are released by December 31, 2008. To date, in direct defiance of the United Nations Security Council and your good offices, the Burmese military junta has instead continued a major crackdown, increasing the number of political prisoners from 1,200 to over 2,100 since June 2007.
We urge you to make it clear that all political prisoners in Burma must be released by the end of this year, regardless of whether you travel to Burma. If the Burmese junta continues to defy the United Nations by refusing to make these releases by the end of the year, we urge you to encourage the Security Council to take further concrete action to implement its call for the release of all political prisoners. The Burmese people are counting on the United Nations to take the required action to achieve the breakthrough they desperately need to both restore democracy to their country and address the serious humanitarian and human rights challenges that they face.

Sincerely,

1. The Honorable Giuliano Amato
Former Prime Minister of Italy (1992–1993, 2000-2001)

2. The Honorable Halldór Ásgrímsson
Former Prime Minister of Iceland (2004-2006)

3. The Honorable Corazon C. Aquino
Former President of the Philippines (1986-1992)

4. The Honorable Patricio Aylwin Azócar
Former President of Chile (1990-1994)

5. The Honorable Hrant Bagratyan
Former Prime Minister of Armenia (1991, 1993-1996)

6. The Honorable Jan Krzysztof Bielecki
Former Prime Minister of Poland (1991)

7. The Honorable Valdis Birkavs
Former Prime Minister of Latvia (1993-1994)

8. The Right Honourable Tony Blair
Former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (1997-2007)

9. The Honorable Kjell Magne Bondevik
Former Prime Minister of Norway (1997-2000, 2001-2005)

10. The Honorable George H.W. Bush
Former President of the United States of America (1989-1993)

11. The Right Honourable Kim Campbell
Former Prime Minister of Canada (1993)

12. The Honorable Ján Čarnogurský
Former Prime Minister of the Slovak Republic (1991-1992)

13. The Honorable Fernando Henrique Cardoso
Former President of Brazil (1995-2003)

14. The Honorable Ingvar Carlsson
Former Prime Minister of Sweden (1986-1991, 1994-1996)

15. The Honorable Jimmy Carter
Former President of the United States of America (1977-1981)

16. The Honorable Joaquim Chissano (1986-2005)
Former President of Mozambique

17. The Honorable Carlo Azelio Ciampi
Former President of Italy (1999-2006)
Former Prime Minister of Italy (1993-1994)
Senator for Life (2006-Present)

18. The Honorable Włodzimierz Cimoszewicz
Former Prime Minister of Poland (1996-1997)

19. The Honorable Emil Constantinescu
Former President of Romania (1996-2000)

20. The Honorable Roberto Dañino
Former Prime Minister of Peru (2001-2002)

21. The Honorable Joseph Deiss
Former President of Switzerland (1994)

22. The Honorable Philip Dimitrov
Former Prime Minister of Bulgaria (1991-1992)

23. The Honorable Abdou Diouf
Former President of Senegal (1981-2000)

24. The Honorable Jacques Delors
Former President of the European Commission (1985-1995)

25. The Honorable Mikuláš Dzurinda
Former Prime Minister of the Slovak Republic (1998-2006)

26. The Honorable Elbegdorj Tsakhiagiin
Former Prime Minister of Mongolia (1998, 2004-2006)

27. The Honorable José María Figueres
Former President of Costa Rica (1994-1998)

28. The Honorable Vigdís Finnbogadóttir
Former President of Iceland (1980-1996)

29. The Honorable Vicente Fox
Former President of Mexico (2000-2006)

30. The Honorable César Gaviria
Former President of Colombia (1990-1994)

31. The Honorable Eugenijus Gentvilas
Former Prime Minister of Lithuania (2001)

32. The Honorable Árpád Göncz
Former President of Hungary (1990-2000)

33. The Honorable Mikhail Gorbachev
Former President of the Soviet Union (1990-1991)

34. The Honorable Inder Kumar Gujral
Former Prime Minister of India (1997-1998)

35. The Honorable Václav Havel
Former President of the Czech Republic (1990-2003)

36. The Right Honourable John Howard AC
Former Prime Minister of Australia (1996-2007)

37. The Honorable Anneli Jäätteenmäki
Former Prime Minister of Finland (2003)

38. The Honorable Thorbjørn Jagland
Former Prime Minister of Norway (1996-1997)

39. The Honorable Lionel Jospin
Former Prime Minister of France (1997-2002)

40. The Honorable Kim Dae-jung
Former President of South Korea (1998-2003)

41. The Honorable Ricardo Froilán Lagos Escobar
Former President of Chile (2000-2006)

42. The Right Honourable Malcolm Fraser AC CH
Former Prime Minister of Australia (1975-1983)

43. The Honorable Osvaldo Hurtado
Former President of Ecuador (1981-1984)

44. The Honorable Jarosław Kaczyński
Former Prime Minister of Poland (2006-2007)

45. The Honorable Girija Prasad Koirala
Former Prime Minister of Nepal (1991-1994, 1998-1999, 2000-2001, 2006-2008)

46. The Honorable Junichiro Koizumi
Former Prime Minister of Japan (2001-2006)

47. The Honorable Wim Kok
Prime Minister of the Netherlands (1994-2002)

48. The Honorable Ivan Kostov
Former Prime Minister of Bulgaria (1997-2001)

49. The Honorable Milan Kucan
Former President of Slovenia (1990-2002)

50. The Honorable Vytautas Landsbergis
Former President of Lithuania (1990-1992)

51. The Honorable Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga
Former President of Sri Lanka (1994-2005)
Former Prime Minister of Sri Lanka (1994)

52. The Honorable Aleksander Kwaśniewski
Former President of Poland (1995-2005)

53. The Honorable Mart Laar
Former Prime Minister of Estonia (1992-1994, 1999-2002)

54. The Honorable Zlatko Lagumdžija
Former Prime Minister of Bosnia and Herzegovina (2001-2002)

55. The Honorable Lee Hae Chan
Former Prime Minister of South Korea (2004-2006)

56. The Honorable Lee Hong-Koo
Former Prime Minister of South Korea (1994-1995)

57. The Honorable Ruud Lubbers
Former Prime Minister of The Netherlands (1982-1994)

58. The Honorable Ferenc Mádl
Former President of Hungary (2000-2005)

59. The Right Honourable Paul Martin
Former Prime Minister of Canada (2003-2006)

60. The Honorable Pandeli Majko
Former Prime Minister of Albania (1998-1999, 2002)

61. The Right Honourable Sir John Major, KG CH PC
Former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (1990-1997)

62. The Honorable Tadeusz Mazowiecki
Former Prime Minister of Poland (1989-1991)

63. The Honorable Péter Medgyessy
Former Prime Minister of Hungary (2002-2004)

64. The Honorable Rexhep Meidani
Former President of Albania (1997-2002)

65. The Honorable Aleksandër Gabriel Meksi
Former Prime Minister of Albania (1992-1997)

66. The Honorable Ilir Meta
Former Prime Minister of Albania (1999-2002)

67. The Honorable Konstantinos Mitsotakis
Former Prime Minister of Greece (1990-1993)

68. The Honorable Benjamin Mkapa
Former President of Tanzania (1995-2005)

69. The Honorable Alfred Spiro Moisiu Former President of Albania (2002-2007)

70. The Honorable António Manuel Mascarenhas Monteiro
Former President of Cape Verde (1991-2001)

71. The Honorable Mike Moore
Former Prime Minister of New Zealand (1990)

72. The Right Honourable Brian Mulroney
Former Prime Minister of Canada (1984-1993)

73. The Honorable Fatos Thanas Nano
Former Prime Minister of Albania (1991, 1997-1998, 2002-2005)

74. The Honorable Odvar Nordli
Former Prime Minister of Norway (1976-1981)

75. The Honorable Davíð Oddsson
Former Prime Minister of Iceland (1991-2004)

76. The Honorable Karl Auguste Offmann
Former President of Mauritius (2002-2003)

77. The Honorable Viktor Orbán
Former Prime Minister of Hungary (1998-2002)

78. The Honorable Andres Pastrana Former President of Colombia (1998-2002)

79. The Honorable Göran Persson
Former Prime Minister of Sweden (1996-2006)

80. The Honorable Lojze Peterle
Former Prime Minister of Slovenia (1990-1992)

81. The Honorable Petr Pithart
Former Prime Minister of the Czech Republic (1990-1992)

82. The Honorable Romano Prodi
Former Prime Minister of Italy (1996-1998, 2006-2008)
Former President of the European Commission (1999-2004)

83. The Honorable Fidel V. Ramos
Former President of the Philippines (1992-1998)

84. The Honorable Eduardo Frei Ruiz-Tagle
Former President of Chile (1994-2000)
Senator for Life (2000-Present)

85. The Honorable Konstantinos Simitis
Former Prime Minister of Greece (1996-2004)

86. The Honorable Konstantinos Stephanopoulos
Former President of Greece (1995-2005)

87. The Honorable José Ramos-Horta
Former Prime Minister of Timor-Leste (2006-2007)
President of Timor-Leste (2008-Present)

88. The Honorable Poul Nyrup Rasmussen
Former Prime Minister of Denmark (1993-2001)

89. The Honorable Mary Robinson
Former President of Ireland (1990-1997)

90. The Honorable Roh Moo-Hyun
Former President of South Korea (2003-2008)

91. The Honorable Arnold Rüütel
Former President of Estonia (2001-2006)

92. The Honorable Michel Rocard
Former Prime Minister of France (1988-1991)

93. The Honorable Eduardo Rodríguez Veltzé
Former President of the Republic of Bolivia (2005-2006)

94. The Honorable Gonzalo Sánchez de Lozada
Former President of Bolivia (1993-1997, 2002-2003)

95. The Honorable Amos Claudius Sawyer
Former President of Liberia (1990-1994)

96. The Honorable Jennifer Shipley
Former Prime Minister of New Zealand (1997-1999)

97. The Honorable Vladimír Špidla
Former Prime Minister of the Czech Republic (2002-2004)

98. The Honorable Levon Ter-Petrossian
Former President of Armenia (1991-1998)

99. The Honorable Malam Bacai Sanhá
Former President of Guinea-Bissau (1999-2000)

100. The Honorable Petar Stoyanov
Former President of Bulgaria (1997-2002)

101. The Honorable Andres Tarand
Former Prime Minister of Estonia (1994-1995)

102. The Right Honourable Baroness Thatcher of Kesteven
Former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (1979-1990)

103. The Honorable Alejandro Toledo
Former President of Peru (2001-2006)

104. The Honorable Ung Huot
Former Prime Minister of Cambodia (1997-1998)

105. The Honorable Cassam Uteem
Former President of Mauritius (1992-2002)

106. The Honorable Vaira Vīķe-Freiberga
Former President of Latvia (1999-2007)

107. The Honorable Richard von Weizsäcker
Former President of Germany (1984-1994)

108. The Honorable Abdurrahman Wahid
Former President of Indonesia (1991-2001)

109. The Honorable Lech Wałęsa
Former President of Poland (1990-1995)

110. The Honorable Kåre Willoch
Former Prime Minister of Norway (1981-1986)

111. The Honorable Albert Zafy
Former President of Madagascar (1993-1996)

112. The Honorable Ernesto Zedillo
Former President of Mexico (1994-2000)

FOR WHOM THE AID COMES IN

The victims of the cyclone Nargis in the delta region, Lower Burma are facing problems of lack of food, water, shelter and clothing. They do not receive aid materials sufficiently. Neither do they get treatment for cyclone-borne injury. Also they are suffering from disease relevant to contaminated water resulted from delaying of removing and destruction of the human corpses and dead animals. Although it is desperately needed to save the people, to cleanse the water by removing dead bodies – or it may effect harmfully the environment – to distribute relief materials from both national and international communities to the victims, the Junta is deliberately disturbing local aid volunteers and blocking international relieve experts.

Not only that Burmese Junta is trying to delay the process of receiving international aid and aid workers, but also that China is opposing in the UN Security Council Meeting against the plan to invade Burma to distribute necessary aid to victims effectively. Whereas, China received international aid for their victims of recent earthquake that shook in Sichuan Province, central China, only one week after the cyclone Nargis. We are wondering why China is trying to hamper the world’s humanitarian effort towards Burmese people who are under horrendous catastrophic disaster. Why are they supporting inhuman military Government without any regard, any sympathy and any empathy to the Burmese people? What is benefit to them for such evil doing? It is humiliation to our people. Also I think it is a criminal. Yet they are not shy in the face of international community.

Now we have learnt that relief teams from the UN, US, Britain and France are standing by in the Thailand water that shares border with Burmese territorial water. They are waiting for permission to enter Burmese water. In such a situation of catastrophic disaster, does it necessary to get permission from such useless and illegal Government, the Junta? I think saving peoples’ life is more important than the Junta’s approval.

Is the UN a nominal organization without practical work? Is it not a trusty-worthy and dependable organization for all people of the world? In stead of being an organization to observe justice among member countries and to assist necessarily with humanitarian aid to all people of the world, it is now just hesitating and wavering to walk along the right way. The UN and international community are negotiating with Burmese authority – just time consuming – to save the people while the death toll increasing day by day due to lack adequate aid materials. Useless organization!

Objection by China in the UN Security Council Meeting against such a humanitarian relief effort is shameful. Its donation to Burma is just a couple of million US$ worth; a paltry sum; at near base in the donation graph. Why do they want to interfere into other country’s internal affair which does not concern with politics? All of our people except the malignant Junta and its colleagues want invasion of the US, the UN and international community into the country to save victims.

They always use the word “internal affair” over Burmese issue. This is just a pure internal and humanitarian affair. Why did they object the international relief efforts for Burmese catastrophe while accepting donation from abroad for their earthquake disaster? Ridiculous! Two situations are completely contrary. This is Chinese policy revealing low morality, low attitude of it. We accuse the Chinese Government of killing our people together with Burmese slaughter Generals. The Chinese Government also must pay back later for it a lot like Than Shwe and his followers. Who can say there will not be a overwhelm boycott of the world to their 2008 Olympic? This will be under nature’s process. Bad deed begets misery and ruins.

Now, it was more than two weeks away that the cyclone Nargis hit the Delta region. Since then, a considerable amount of relief aid from abroad could not arrive at the hands of the victims. Victim’s situation is deteriorating; more and more people will die under insignificant change of international relief policy. Death toll will, according to the UN and other organizations’ prediction, swell over 220,000 – more than that of Bangladesh cyclone that hit in 1991 losing just over 138,000 lives – and it is the worst devastating situation in Burmese history.

We, Burmese people, ask international community for urgent relief efforts including relief experts and workers to enter Burma so that they can distribute necessary aids effectively and save our people from extremely dangerous situation resulting from a lack of food, clean water, proper treatment, medicine, shelter and clothing. Otherwise, great tragedy will happen in this civilized world because of irrational beings, the Burmese Junta.

Shwe Sea Sar (Yangon)

(COURTESY OF DR. LUN SWE IN MAE SOT, THAILAND)

"The downpour is ours"

The first cut of the monetary donations go to the military junta and the Army members received the second cut. The third cut is for cronies of the junta. How much do you think the survivors of the Nargis Cyclone get? The cartoon shows the donation which is meant for them has been robbed by the junta and its followers.

REFERENDUM BEFORE RELIEF



The paranoid military regime in Burma is going too far and degrade itself again by revealing its true nature. This time the military thieves irresponsibly ignore the survivors of Nargis Cyclone and shamelessly collecting ballots from people in the light of people mourning for victims of the castastrophe. To make it worst, in some locations the axe handles (cronies of the regime such as Kyantphut and Sunareshin members) are using force to obtain "Yes" vote to the ridiculous constitution drawn by the regime. They even beat and threaten the people who are reluctantly giving votes to them in the time of mourning for the death of thousands of people whose lives were taken away by the recent cyclone. The authorities also robbed the relief aids that was given by foreign organizations. They hoard the relief goods in the warehouses of military units and later distributed to Army members. Quality and nutritous food go to Tamadaw members and for the survivors of cyclone the authorities provide unqualified local food. manufactured by the government factories, to the survivors who are mostly farmers by profession. These farmers are paddy growers of the delta and the rice have to be handed over to the government depots after the harvest. Then the junta exports to foreign countries in order to get hard money. Finally, all the profits went into the pockets of top brass. As a gesture of gratitude to the farmers the junta is refusing most external aids that is meant for the survivors. The junta also ban journalists and relief aid workers to go to the cyclon-affected areas. It is ridiculous that donors inside as well as outside have to plead the regime in order that their relief goods go through. Worst of all, the UN is calling for an emergency meeting to make convince the mily. government for accepting the aids that are flowing in from many countries. The regime does not care about the people. What they care is only for their own interests and to stay long in power. They are regarding their own people as enemies because people have demanded freedom and human rights in last September. The regime responded them with bullets and many people, including students and monks were crushed down in the Saffron Movement. With the firm backing of Chinese government, the military regime is running amok and creating chaos and killing fields in the midst of pleading by the UN and international community. All the leaders of resistance movements are now in the prison and the opposition leader is under house arrest. What can people do now? They would not risk their lives as they believe nothing will be changed. As China becomes one of her important economic allies, the United States can only pay lip services in supporting Burmese people who are in distress. Also what can the UN do? Nothing more than passing a resolution (like previous years) that cannot remove the regime that gives trouble not only to its own country but also to the regions. The military junta will never pay attention to the UN or international community. Unless Burmese people cannot remove the military junta by themselves (as nobody from outside is going to help effectively) let the devil continue ruling the country until the entire nation faces the utter destruction.

ATROCITIES OF MILY. REGIME IN BURMA


This terrible photo has been sent to international media from a blogger inside Burma. One of the victims of the atrocities of the military regime, this dead body was kept in a mortuary of a seal-off hospital in Rangoon. The picture was smuggled out by a staff of the mortuary and sent it to a blogger who finally transmitted this picture throughout the world to show how brutal and merciless is the regime. The head is seen hacked with a sword, possibly a bayonet, by the military intelligence's butchers. The world community and the the world body must do something so as UNSC take effective action on the Burmese regime. For staying long in power dictator Than Shwe will do anything. The regime is shouting that they are striving hard to transform the country into a democratic state. But how can people of the world believe their non-sense road map and their promise after they committed a crime of the century. The world has been cheaten again and again by the military junta of Burma and China, Russia and India on the other hand are supporting the junta that is killing, arresting and torturing the people including Buddhist monks.

CRIME OF THE CENTURY

THE PERSECUTION OF FALUN GONG: 1999 - 2006
  • July 20, 1999: Chinese Communist Party leader Jiang Zemin bans Falun Gong. Practitioners are categorized as "felons" and regarded as raw materials to be handled in any way profitable, without penalty.
  • 70 - 100 million practitioners overnight are labeled as criminals because of their spiritual beliefs.
  • As of September 2006, 2930 practitioners are confirmed dead; the actual death toll is estimated to be 10,000+.
  • 100,000 - 500,000+ have been sent to labor camps, prisons and mental hospitals.
  • Collusion between the Chinese judiciary, police and hsopitals, overseen by the CCP military, sustains a network to harvest Falun Gong practitioners' organs, while they are still alive, fo transplant operations. The huge profits fuel China's "organ tourism".
  • The CCP blacklists and harasses practitioners worldwide.
  • Using technologies largely developed and sustained by North American companies, the CCP maintains an information blockade and disseminates propaganda.

HELP STOP ORGAN HARVESTING IN PRC

HELP STOP ORGAN HARVESTING IN CHINA

Chinese Communist Party seizes organs
from captive Falun Gong practitioners
for huge profits
Transplant operation prices from a hospital website that witnesses say has been connected to a concentration camp: http://en.zoukiishouku.com/list/cost.htm (Prices no longer available online.)

Prices of various organs as mentioned below:
Cornea $ 30,000
Heart $ 130,000 - $ 160,000
Liver $ 98,000 - $ 130,000
Lung $ 150,000 - $ 170,000
Kidney $ 62,000
Kidney-Pancreas $ 150,000




BOYCOTT OLYMPIC 2008!

EXPOSURE OF ORGAN HARVESTING PROMPTS SURGE OF
KILLING IN CHINESE HOSPITALS & CONCENTRATION CAMPS

Witness says Falun Gong bodies used as "Raw Materials"
for profiteering

Officials rush to cash in on detainees' bodies as they hide
and destroy evidence throughout China


Following revelations that Falon Gong practitioners' organs are being harvested and that the corpses are being cremated in a vast network of slave labor and concentration camps across China, investigators disclosed that the Chinese Communist Party has been conducting a massive, deadly campaign to hide and destroy evidence.

Investigators report that Chinese transplant hospitals told patients to "come in quickly" to get transplants, and that matching organs "will be available in one or two days".

Initial allegations were made by three witnesses, including a military doctor, who said the operations are performed while the victims are still alive so that the organs are fresh. The bodies are then cremated on site.

Follow the money

The doctor stated that the lucrative selling of captives' organs and bodily materials is driving the camps. "Falun Gong practitioners... are no longer regarded as human beings, but as raw materials for commercial products...the CCP...decided to treat (them) as 'class enemies' and felons, and handle them in any manner economically profitable."

Third-Party report confirms organ harvesting charges
Taken seriously by the international media, this independent report exposes the brutality and gives 17 recommendations on how to stop it.

Former Canadian Secretary of State David Kilgour and human rights lawyer David Matas published a 45-page investigative report into the organ harvesting allegations. "Based on what we now know, we have come to the regrettable conclusion that the allegations are true. We believe that there has been and continues today to be large scale organ seizures from unwilling Falun Gong practitioners." (for a free copy of the report and a link to the global media coverage: http://investigation.go.saveinter.net/)

TO GET RID OF MILY. REGIME IN BURMA

The tide of democracy has been risen up again in Burma and the leaders of 88 Generation Students and many more activists have been detained by the military regime of the country following series of protest against the raising of fuel price by the regime that consequently deteriorated a living condition of people. In fact, people are long been experiencing hardships and human rights and democracy have been stripped off for over forty decades since the military regime staged a coup in 1962. The world body knows about this country situation past and present and how the regime seized power from the legitimate government. The UN knows the blood-shed coup in which thousand of students were shot to death. The world body knows that the ruling Burmese Socialist Program Party had to abolish due to demands of its entire members and people of all walks of life. The UN also knows that thousands of students, monks and people had to give their lives in the struggle for abolishing BSPP and to retain Democracy in Burma. But, the regime has refused to handover power to the opposition party NLD that won a landslide victory in the 1990 nationwide elections. The regime not only showed respect to the elections result but also tried to assassinate Aung San Su Kyi, the opposition leader and Nobel laureate at Depayin. Furthermore, the regime places the leader under house arrest now and then, harassed and hindered all the political functions of NLD and prohibit hitherto to open NLD offices in the country. When the US put Burma crisis on the UN agenda and urged UNSC to take action on the regime China and Russia had blocked the effort of the States with their veto powers. Burma is formed with 55 millions of people and if the ruler represents this people the government must look after the interest of the people. So if the ruler is seeking for their own benefit it is clear that it is not a genuine government but none other than a gang of thugs. It is understood that when a government misrule the country and cannot proved that it really represent people to rule a country such government must be removed. If they are refusing to step down they must be removed by the world body after giving an ultimatum to the unlawful government. Let’s ask a question. To whom the UN will respect?. The super powers who misuse veto power or people of Burma who have been suffered for over 40 years? The world body has formed with the agreement to see to the matter of member countries in need of help. Will the world body waits until the military rules the country generation after generation, while people serve as their slaves, as long as they rule or helping out the long suffered people by removing the self-claim government or the government that is not elected by the people? There is no member country in the world body that rules against the will of people for more than four decades. If the UN could not remove the wicked government that is systematically killing its own people it means that the world body recommends such kind of government. Will UN waits for financial assistance from here and there to give relief aids to refugees and displaced people created by the bad governments and dictators or assert efforts in bringing out a perfect resolution to get rid of unwanted governments within the member countries? Burma's problem can be easily solved if the veto powers are not allowed to use by the super powers . To stop more killings, rapes, misruling and corruption by a government that is not elected by the people the UN must reconsider the authorizing of veto power to super powers or reform its organization and policy -- the policy that approves only a legitimate government is allowed to rule a country.

Open Letter to Ma Than Shwe

Dear Ma Sandar,

You have mentioned in your commentary (DVB's Let's Talk) thatthe people of Burma understand well that we can not throw away the junta at all – furthermore this must not be our goal either- we must not even down-look our military at all, instead we must transform it very slowly”.

Well, I won’t agree with you if you said so. Because Burma has an estimated population of 55 millions and if the people love the junta there will only be one per cent of the entire population of the country. That two per cent for sure is a handful of well-off persons and their families who are colloborating with the Generals so as to accumulate their wealth and another handful of people is close relatives of the Generals and members of USDA. Ninety-nine per cent of people are suffering a lot due to the dictatorial ruling in our country. Will these people support or love the mily. regime? Think it logically. Sound really bad when you said “not to even look down our military”. This remind me of Aung Gyi ( We called him Samoosa Aung Gyi ) who slipped his tongue during 8888 by saying “don’t ever get wrong (even by thought) with the Army”. Finally, what he becomes? Did you remember? And don’t you easily say that “we must transform the Army very slowly”. How can you transform a building that have been eaten by white ants for many a year? Are you going to destroy it or are you renovate by coating the structures with grease oil or whatever? What you said are ridiculous. You know. But you are lying to yourself. You want to hide the truth. I do not know why you have to do this. Who will accept and support the notorious Army that has been corrupted for many years? Instead of serving the people the Army members and the top brass are seeking their own benefit hitherto and above all the regime is commiting genocide. So many Karen national have been displaced. Many ethnics women have been raped by the Army members, while the top brass are having juicy time with some celebrities in the country. To get rid of the mily. junta is a primary goal of majority people who love peace and democracy. You must keep this in your mind now and forever, Ma Sandar (or) Ma Than Shwe. If you really love your country.

Maung Maung Kyaw Win, U.S.A.

Voice of SPDC

People in Burma unanimously agreed to the names given to SPDC propaganda papers as New Lies of Myanmar (the actual name is New Light of Myanmar), Bagdad Kyemon and Iraq Alin, by an anonymous dissident. The papers have regularly conveyed pro-Iraq news among other propagandas under the guidance and direction of the mily. regime's Ministry of Information. The purpose to carry pro-Iraq news is no other than to denounce the US, a super power that strongly support the struggle for restoring Democracy in Burma. The Minister for Information of the mily. regime is Brigadier General Kyaw Hsan and this stooge led the news conference which is regularly held in the country. All the selected mediamen have to attend the conference where all the lies and allegation are being made upon the student leaders of 88 generation and NLD members.

4th of July Celebrations in the States

How happy and gay the American citizens were. The Fourth of July celebration was in full swing with people who were in the mood for love their own country. The celebration in Wheaton really gave me a mixed feeling. I witnessed the long parade that marched along the Main Road and either sides of the pavement town folks from early age to over seventy were giving shouts of greeting and respect to the people who were marching along the road. There were veterans and famous people among the people participated in the parade. They had shown their courage and patriotic spirits back in World War II . The significant event in Wheaton reminds me of our country's independence day that becomes less important today for the present military regime that is ruling Burma for more than four decades without the will of people. Nowaday there are very few celebrations in our country to mark the significant day and the regime has defaced the image of the architect of Burma's independence, General Aung San. In fact, Aung San was also the leader who built up the Burmese Army. If the military regime is not insane they would not ignore and forget their foremost leader and the General who had tried to get Burma's independence from the British. These butchers have gone too far. I held up my tears that was about to drop down after realizing the difference of the independence day of the two nations.

THREE SINISTERS TO WATCH

China, Russia and Burma are the three nations that can harm the peaceful nations, anytime. Leaders of these nations are mentally unbalanced. That is why they are doing what they like and show no respect to the UN and the rest nations in this world. China is secretly trying to undermine the democratic world and Russia is acting as a running dog of China. Thereby world communities should not keep silence. They must raise their voices against the three sinisters' plot to rule the world.

AS I SEE IT



National Convention has been created by the military junta as one of its tactics to stay in power and stalling time for handing over power to the winning party NLD in the nationwide elections held in 1992. With the Road Map and National Convention I see no solution for Burma's problem. Now that the regime is saying to hold another referendum meaning that it won't recognize the result of the last elections. If the regime manage to hold another election, it is no doubt that the new election by the junta will not be realized in favor of the people. As the leopard will never change its spots, the junta will again plays trick to the people and the world. Once a thief is always a thief. This saying is always true for the military butchers.
GONE BUT STILL IN HEARTS OF THOSE
WHO LOVE HIM

General Aung San, the architect of Burmese Independence still live and he is watching the military butchers (who are blacksheeps of the Armed Forces that he had built) how far they can go in devastating their own country and driving the fellow countrymen to become their own slave. He is also watching how long the butchers can put under house arrest to his daughter, Aung San Suu Kyi. The unscrupulous rulers who are no more than thugs enjoy their days that are already numbered. In a Burmese saying it is said "a mad dog can enjoy its prime time that is only lasted for one noon". Like the mad dog the military regime would not last long. Soon when the sun is up and reaching the zenith point it is a time of termination for the military butchers led by Than Shwe.
Wait until Highnoon!
Wait for the downfall of the military junta!
Wait for the time our great leader Aung San finally rest in Peace!

What they suggest

What they suggest
Copy from Yahoo Page

Best Answer

First, through a concerted, non-violent protest by all citizens of the country at home and international fora. If it is responded by repression and harsher measures, then, through an armed revolution. Such moves are sure to be supported by all democratic and peace loving countries of the world. (modest)

(The question for above answer was asked by Min Myo Naing using another name in June of 2006.)

Profile

My photo
An exiled journalist from Burma, I have taken refuge in the United States with my family thanks to CPJ in New York, UNHCR (Cambodia) and the States Department. I was detained for one and a half year in 1969 for burning effigy of the late dictator Ne Win in the Rangoon University campus during SEA Games Strike. I was also actively participated in 8888 nationwide uprising by taking charge in publishing The Guardian Daily as independent newspaper for 22 days before I resigned from the newspaper as Assistant Editor in September,1988. Fortunately, I was escaped from arresting by the military regime. In 1990, I left for Bangkok where I had an assignment to translate the "Outrage: Burma's Struggle for Democracy". The book was originally written by Bertil Lintner, a Swedish journalist. I fled my country in December 2005 after my life was threatened by the military intelligence service for involving in political movements and had given assistance to foreign journalists who came to Burma. I am still active with the movement for restoring democracy in Burma.