2010 OR DECISIVE YEAR?

Some are hoping that the year 2010 will see a significant change in Burma and people will be freed from the life of slavery under military regime because the regime has promised another free and fair elections in the country. In fact, the regime has failed to recognize the 1990 nationwide elections in which the NLD Party won a landslide victory which is internationally recognized. After refusing to handover power to the winning party the generals have accumulated their wealth within two decades. All the income realized from selling natural resources such as gem and jade and natural gas to foreign countries went into their pockets and the country itself has insufficient electrical power supply for the industries as well as for public use. People have to pay more taxes and receive power supplies only on a quota basis. The small business as well as industries have to depend on electrical generators run by diesel oil of which prices are going high all the time. The inflation is soaring high. Though the top brass become millionaires with the ill-gotten money people and country cannot climb out of the abyss of poverty. And now the regime is promising again a free and fair election as the international pressure to reform economic and politics of the country is increasing. Who will believe their words when people learn that the regime has recently signed a contract with Russia to buy over twenty MIG 29s just to (unnecessarily) expand and modernize its Army. The regime has also dug a total of 80 underground tunnels at a cost of billion of dollars with the assistance of North Korean engineers. The purpose of digging underground tunnels is none other than fortifying their hideout with a hysteria ( of fear) believing that some super powers will wage aerial attacks on their military headquarters. One of the reasons the regime and its cronies moved to Pyinmana area where they established a new city is none other than hiding out from the truth they have never accepted. This prove that they are not real soldiers who protect the interest of their people and country. The real soldier never afraid to die. They never hide from the truth and they are ready to give their lives and will fight like a soldier. What the regime doing is a scheme to protect for themselves as the way cowards do. Anyhow, what a waste. With this money it can feed the increasing people who have no way to get out of the vicious cycle of starvation and help them out in rebuilding their lives. Meanwhile, the North Korean and the mily. regime is secretly planning to build a nuclear bomb and at present the regime is trying to assault one of the insurgent groups of the country with Biological weapons bought from N. Korea. The insurgent group is also preparing for the war that is about to come. They are now busy with buying anti-gas masks from a neighboring country, according to a reliable news source.
One of the awful news is that a newly formed political party that is preparing to participate in the 2010 elections was threaten and its members were beaten by Union Solidarity and Development Association's members, a regime-supported gang that carried out an attempt to assassinate the noble laureate and democracy icon of Burma, Daw Aung San Su Kyi, in 2003. This gang is supposed to be a social faction that is meant for helping people but on the contrary the gang is used by the regime to harass and threatening NLD members. Sometimes, these unruly thugs go too far that they even eliminate the unwanted persons by the regime. But the order to kill is given by a high-ranking person of USDA possibly the Chairman of USDA who is also the head of the regime Senior General Than Shwe. Meanwhile, the Police General has directed to his subordinates to monitor every and each movement of NLD members. It's been many years that thousands of political prisoner are still behind bars though the Secretary General of the United Nations, some heads of super power and world communities have constantly requested the regime to release the political prisoners immediately. Daw Aung San Su Kyi is also still under house arrest. The authority has not even permitted the opposition leader to renovate her own house. If this trivial matter cannot be straighten out, I wonder how will the regime going to sponsor a free and fair nationwide elections. These aspects indicate that the attitude of mily. regime has not changed and they will eat again their words. No doubt. So, I see no good sign for the year 2010. People who really love peace and democracy should be very careful especially in this year. This year may be a decisive year for both the light and dark forces. The bottom line is "Hope for the best and prepare for the worst". Happy New Year! to everyone who is in the same boat with us sailing to our destination, a peaceful place called "the land of democracy". ( MMKW)

Burma VJ official UK release movie website supported by The Co-operative

Burma VJ official UK release movie website supported by The Co-operative

Shared via AddThis

A LETTER FROM JEREMY WOODRUM OF U.S CAMPAIGN BURMA

Dear Maung,

While most of the time we contact you to let you know about an opportunity for action, in this instance we just want to share some good news. Because of your efforts, 55 members of Congress signed on to a letter asking for a United Nations Security Council investigation into crimes against humanity committed by Burma's military regime. See letter and signatures here. This is the first time that members of Congress have called for such action by the UN in regards to Burma. A similar effort was recently joined by 60 British parliamentarians. The move by Congress follows the release of a groundbreaking report by Harvard University, commissioned by five of the world's top judges, which calls for the UN Security Council to take action to end mass atrocities in Burma. The report draws on six years of UN documentation to show that there is enough evidence to warrant a Security Council investigation. The report finds: "Epidemic levels of forced labor in the 1990s, the recruitment of tens of thousands of child soldiers, widespread sexual violence, extrajudicial killings and torture, and more than a million displaced persons. One statistic may stand out above all others, however: the destruction, displacement, or damage of over 3,000 ethnic nationality villages over the past twelve years, many burned to the ground." After the release of the report, two of the judges wrote a strong opinion piece in the Washington Post which succinctly sums up the reports conclusions.In the past, the UN Security Council has voted to establish a "Commission of Inquiry" to investigate abuses of a major magnitude -- such as in the former Yugoslavia, Rwanda, and the Darfur region of Sudan. The Commission of Inquiry then makes recommendations to the UN Security Council for action. However, no such Commission of Inquiry has been created for Burma. The efforts by the US Congress -- and the team of judges working with Harvard is important because for the first time people are calling for a Commission of Inquiry into human rights abuses in Burma.Thank you for all of your efforts in encouraging the United States to support this effort. Right now, Congress is awaiting a reply from President Obama...

Sincerely,

Jeremy Woodrum

TWO DEFECTORS REVEAL BURMESE REGIME'S SECRET PLAN

Burma to test atomic bomb in a few years?

Melbourne, Aug. 1: As world concerns remain focused on the clandestine nuclear programme of North Korea and Iran, reports are filtering in of Burma’s isolated military junta may be just a few years from testing its first atomic bomb.
The key far-eastern nation is building a secret nuclear reactor and plutonium extraction facilities with North Korea’s help, Sydney Morning Herald has reported citing two key junta defectors. The Burmese military has sited the reactor in mountain caves inter-linked by deep tunnels at Naung Laing in Northern part of the country, apparently to camouflage it from detection by satellites.
The secret complex, the paper said, runs parallel to a civilian reactor being built at another site by Russia that both the Moscow and Rangoon authorities say will be put under international safeguards. The revelations by the daily come as United States naval warships recently shadowed a North Korean commercial vessel bound for Burma, suspecting it to be carrying contraband nuclear and missile components. However, the ship was not intercepted. China and other Asian nations had helped persuade Burma to turn back the North Korean freighter, the Nam Kam 1. A month back the Japanese police arrested a North Korean and two of its own nationals allegedly trying to export illegally to Burma magnetic measuring device that could be used to develop missiles.
The daily identified the two defectors as an officer with the Burmese Army’s secret nuclear battalion and the other a former executive and leading regime business partner who handled nuc-lear contracts with Russia and North Korea. —PTI

SUPPORT A COMMISSION OF INQUIRY FOR BURMA

President Barack Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NWWashington, DC 20500

Dear President Obama,
Successive U.S. administrations, with overwhelming bi-partisan support from Congress, have shown their support for Burmese peoples’ aspiration to live in a democratic society free from their military dictatorship. Unfortunately, despite U.S. efforts as well as decades of peaceful attempts by successive United Nations Special Envoys and Rapporteurs to convince the Burmese military regime to end its atrocities and seek a peaceful transition to democracy, peace, democracy and stability elude Burma.
Therefore, we urge you to take the lead in establishing a United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Commission of Inquiry into the Burmese military regime’s crimes against humanity and war crimes against its civilian population. Similar cases in Rwanda, Yugoslavia, and Darfur have all led to Commissions of Inquiry and each previous case had UN Special Envoys and Special Rapporteurs assigned to seeking peaceful solutions to their respective countries international humanitarian crises. Still though, the UNSC took the necessary step and established a Commission of Inquiry to investigate and provide justice and accountability for the war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide committed with impunity by state agents. By elevating the cause of Burma to the UNSC, the United States is putting Burma’s supporters on notice that we will not support the status quo while millions of people languish.
The United Nations has passed over 30 resolutions acknowledging and decrying the Burmese military regime’s crimes and blatant system of impunity. All the while, Burma’s military regime has carried out a scorched-earth campaign against the country’s ethnic minority civilian population, destroying over 3,300 villages, using systematic rape as a weapon of war, pressing the Burmese people into modern-day slave labor, killing innocent civilians, and forcing at least one million people to flee their homes as refugees and internally displaced. The regime has also conscripted tens of thousands of child soldiers, and imprisoned and tortured those who dare speak out in support of freedom and democracy.
Compounding the brutality of the regime’s war crimes and crimes against humanity is their flagrant system of impunity, in which perpetrators go free, but victims fear retribution if they seek accountability and justice. While the “slow burn” nature of the military regime’s grave crimes has kept the spotlight away from these atrocities, it makes them no less dire. In fact, it makes it ever more urgent that we call upon the UNSC to hold the Burmese military regime to account for their war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Furthermore, the regime’s constitution, on which it predicates its upcoming elections in 2010, contains an amnesty provision that exempts all members of the military regime from prosecution. The amnesty provision is a blatant attempt to legitimize the structured and systematic violence in the country for all junta inflicted crimes. In addition to the amnesty provision, the constitution also removes any rights for civil redress for victims of crimes committed by the military and police and blocks access to justice in civilian courts thus effectively denying justice to the regime’s victims.
The world must not sit by and allow Burma’s regime to commit mass atrocities with impunity. We urge you to urgently seek support at the UNSC for a Commission of Inquiry to investigate the Burmese regime’s war crimes, crimes against humanity and system of impunity. The regime must be held accountable, on behalf of the millions of people of Burma who have no other course for redress.
Sincerely,

Joe Crowley (D-NY)

Don Manzullo (R-IL)

Rush Holt (D-NJ)

Peter King (R-NY)

Anna Eshoo (D-CA)

Madeline Bordallo (D-Guam)

Carolyn Maloney (D-NY)

Joseph Pitts (R-PA)

Brad Sherman (D-CA)

Michael Michaud (D-ME)

Jim Moran (D-VA)

Frank Wolf (R-VA)

Mark Kirk (R-IL)

Brian Bilbray (R-CA)

David Price (D-NC)

Dan Maffei (D-NY)

Adam Schiff (D-CA)

Allyson Schwartz (D-PA)

Maxine Waters (D-CA)

Mary Jo Kilroy (D-OH)

Paul Hodes (D-NH)

Bob Inglis (R-SC)

Gerry Connolly (D-VA)

Tim Bishop (D-NY)

Henry Waxman (D-CA)

Edward Royce (R-CA)

Tom Perriello (D-VA)

Janice Schakowsky (D-IL)

James Langevin (D-RI)

Maurice Hinchey (D-NY)

Trent Franks (R-AZ)

Mark Souder (R-IN)

Aaron Schock (R-IL)

Michael Honda (D-CA)

Steve Israel (D-NY)

Albio Sires (D-NJ)

James McGovern (D-MA)

Ruben Hinojosa (D-TX)

Todd Platts (R-PA)

Thaddeus McCotter (R-MI)

Tim Ryan (D-OH)

Michael McMahon (D-NY)

Patrick Kennedy (D-RI)

John Boozeman (R-AR)

Peter Welch (D-VT)

Dan Burton (R-IN)

Gene Green (D-TX)

Luis Gutiérrez (D-IL)

Jim Costa (D-CA)

John Culberson (R-TX)

Jackie Speier (D-CA)

Mike Thompson (D-CA)

Brad Miller (D-NC)

Betsy Markey (D-CO)

Anh (Joseph) Cao (R-LA)

EFFECTIVE ACTION MUST BE TAKEN BEFORE THEY GET UPPERHAND

A year after restoring ties between North Korea and Burma, news of North Korean vessel calling to Rangoon port leaked out. The Korean ships reportedly unloaded arms and other equipments to be used for military purpose. It loaded rice and other agricultural products and left the port for home. Later, General Shwemann of Burmese Armed Forces visited Pyongyang. Thus, the relationship between Burma and North Korea further strengthen and the two countries have established a new chapter that will not welcome by Burmese people as well as the peace-loving world communities. Burma's military regime and North Korea have secretly engaging a mutual benefit business that can lead to both regional and global threat and this become an important issue as the political analysts point out citing information gathered by investigative reporters who are in pursuit of the Korean-Burmese secret movement. What are the mutual benefit that will be resulted from their cooperation? It is obvious that military regime in Burma will get the missiles and arm-producing technology from North Korea and in return North Korea will get food and refined uranium that imported from Russia by the regime. As the stubborn and cunning North Korea never pay heed to the UN resolution to refrain from testing missile and secretly developing atomic bomb, peace-lovers around the globe will not tolerate when learning that North Korea and Burma are secretly running a project that is threatening the world. The world body and the world communities must take action on the axis- of- evil countries (North Korea, Burma and Iran) before they get upperhand to destroy the world.

NORTH KOREAN TUNNELLERS FORTIFY BURMA JUNTA

(An article appeared in TIMEONLINE, July 4, 2009, contributed by Michael Sheridan)

The first strangers appeared some time ago in the jungles of Arakan, in northern Burma, mystifying the villagers whose lives revolved around their golden temples and their crops.
The older people thought they might be Japanese, remembering those who had fought against the British during the second world war for every inch of this monsoon-drenched land, but their language sounded harsher.
In fact, they were North Korean engineers building a complex of tunnels and bunkers for the Burmese military junta in an axis of outcasts.
More North Koreans were soon being seen — and even photographed by a daring local person — around Naypyidaw, the junta’s isolated new capital, where they oversaw labour gangs excavating a subterranean complex.
A third group of North Koreans has now been spotted in Chin state, bordering India and Bangladesh, an area full of restive minorities where few tourists venture. They are said to be equipping tunnels with generators and anti-gas ventilation systems.
Eventually the junta is to have a web of underground command posts, linked by fibreoptic cables, to help it put down any revolt and keep control in a national emergency, according to exiles from Burma and diplomats in Rangoon.
The North Koreans have sold similar services in the past to Saddam Hussein’s Iraq as well as to Iran and Syria.
One report suggested that some sections of tunnels in Burma were wide enough for trucks and could accommodate 600 personnel for several months, with storage space for food and weaponry.
Tunnelling is a military engineering skill that the North Koreans have perfected while honeycombing their fortress homeland with underground hangars and shelters against air or missile bombardment.
The North Koreans also specialise in air defence systems and radar. Their own installations were good enough to spot a Japanese electronic warfare aircraft taking off from its base in Honshu last month and to track its flight path all the way to the North Korean coast.
Such expertise has made them natural partners for the Burmese military, which shares their preoccupations with domestic security and foreign threats.
Yet it was only the presence of the North Korean workers that told Burmese onlookers of a secret relationship that has deepened as the two regimes have been pushed closer by international sanctions.

After exiles posted photographs on the internet, Burmese intelligence launched a "huge investigation" that led to the arrests of several journalists and the dismissal of senior officers, according to The Nation, a Thai newspaper. It quoted Thai intelligence officers, who watch Burma closely, confirming the existence of the tunnels.
The new alliance has required the leaders of Burma and North Korea to forget the bloody events of 1983, when a team of terrorists acting on the orders of Kim Jong-il blew up a ceremony welcoming the South Korean cabinet to Rangoon, killing 22 people, including ministers.
Since 2007, when the two re-established diplomatic relations after a 24-year break, shipping agents have noted a steady stream of vessels calling at the port of Thilawa.
The two pariah nations, all but cut off from global trade, appear to have agreed on a barter system. The North Korean ships have unloaded heavy equipment and wooden crates. Although dockside workers could not read the markings, they appeared to be military consignments, probably small arms and ammunition.
In return, the Burmese labourers piled rice, rubber, hardwood and rare minerals into the holds. Burma is rich in ores, including uranium.
Another advantage for North Korea is that goods can be transferred in Burmese ports to ships destined for Iran, frustrating attempts by the United States and its allies to watch and perhaps intercept military shipments.
Last week a mysterious North Korean ship, the Kang Nam 1, reversed course and steamed homewards after being trailed by an American Aegis-class destroyer, the USS John McCain, on a suspected voyage to Burma.
The CIA is principally concerned with perhaps the strangest of all Burma’s projects — its plan to operate a nuclear research reactor supplied by Rosatom, a Russian company, under an agreement announced in May 2007.
The reactor will be similar to North Korea’s plant at Yongbyon, which has been used to make plutonium for Kim’s nuclear bombs.
At least 350 Burmese, most of them military personnel, have received training in Russia and exiles reported that 80 others went to North Korea for instruction.
"I have to say it is childish of the Burmese generals to dream about acquiring nuclear technology since they can’t even provide regular electricity in Burma," said Thakhin Chan Tun, a former Burmese ambassador to Pyongyang, in an interview with The Irrawaddy, an exile magazine.
Than Shwe, the elderly junta leader, is not playing, however. A 37-page report leaked to Radio Free Asia reveals details of a visit to North Korea last November by a military delegation. It was led by the third man in his regime, Thura Shwe Mann, the army chief of staff.
The report describes how the 17-man Burmese group agreed to co-operate on training, special forces operations and "the building of tunnels for aircraft and ships as well as other underground military installations".
The alliance has also helped to fortify Than Shwe’s political will. This weekend he turned down a personal appeal from Ban Ki-moon, the United Nations secretary-general, to free all political prisoners including Aung San Suu Kyi, the opposition leader.
North Korea launched seven short-range ballistic missiles yesterday in defiance of United Nations resolutions. They travelled for about 250 miles before falling into the sea.

DPRK-BURMA SECRET COOPERATION, A THREATENING TO THE WORLD?

June 24, 2009 (DVB)–New images have emerged that show North Korean and other foreign advisers in Burma consulting with officials on what now appears to be an extensive network of some 800 underground tunnels across much of the country.
While rife government corruption and uneven development in Burma yesterday awarded Burma a spot at the bottom of Foreign Policy magazine’s Failed States Index, billions of US dollars are now known to have been channeled by the Burmese government into building the tunnels.
DVB has been tracking the development of the tunnels and underground installations in Burma for a number of years. This is the first in a series of DVB stories revealing the secretive tunnel project.
Evidence has been obtained that shows between 600 and 800 tunnels in various stages of construction, with work on some sections dating as far back as 1996.
Photographs of a number of tunnel sites clearly show North Korean advisers present. In one photograph of a work site at Pyinmanar Taung Nyo, dated 29 May 2006, North Korean advisers are seen training Burmese soldiers and technicians in tunnel construction.
Several government budget files also show evidence of foreign aid and loans being used to fund construction work.
A number of senior Burmese officials have been dismissed in recent days following the first publication of DVB’s tunnel photographs in the Yale Global Online on 8 June.
The military government has launched an investigation into how details of such a sensitive project were leaked, with associates of former intelligence chief Lieutenant General Khin Nyunt being questioned by police.
Further intelligence documents obtained by DVB show that the tunnel system is being disguised by the government as a fibre optic cable installation project.
Leaked engineering designs show, however, that some sections of the tunnels are wide enough to allow trucks to enter and leave. There is also storage space for food and weaponry, and separate rooms that would hold around 600 personnel for several months.
The documents also reveal plans to hold large rockets and satellite communication command centers inside the tunnels.
Although the financially weak Burmese government is thought to allocate some 40 per cent of its budget for military purposes, the tunnel project over the course of 13 years has likely run into the billions.
Some observers have speculated that the abrupt hike in fuel prices that sparked the September 2007 protests may have been a prelude to securing extra capital for the project.
Likewise, Burma struck a deal with China in April this year to siphon its vast offshore natural gas reserves to China’s energy hungry population, a venture that will have given the tunnel project an important boost.
Speculation that Burma is trading in military hardware with North Korea was reinforced on Monday with reports that a North Korean freighter ship believed to be carrying arms was headed in the direction of Burma.
Despite only reestablishing diplomatic ties in 2007, following North Korea’s bombing of a South Korean delegation in Rangoon in 1983, the two countries share characteristics that make them obvious allies.
According to journalist and expert on North Korea-Burma relations, Bertil Lintner, both countries have "absolutely no interest" in supporting respective UN arms embargoes.
Indeed, North Korea is one of the few countries willing to continue military trade with the pariah state, with "even China…reluctant to sell certain types of equipment to Burma", according to Lintner.
Perhaps most worryingly for countries outside of Burma’s friendship group, it has renewed an alliance with a country that is rapidly becoming the icon of a new generation of ‘rogue states’ threatening nuclear warfare.
With this in mind, speculation will likely start to circulate as to whether the tunnel network could be linked to rumours that Burma is mining uranium ore, a key ingredient for nuclear fission. No evidence has yet appeared to verify this, however.
In our next story we will reveal the purpose of these tunnels, foreign involvement in the project and what is inside the tunnels.

FREE OUR DEMOCRATIC LEADER

(Editorial of Irrawaddy online news magazine, 28 June, 2009)

The removal of Aung San Suu Kyi from her home to Rangoon’s infamous Insein Prison and her trial before a secret court have sparked international outrage and condemnation, shared by world leaders, Nobel Prize winners and prominent personalities.
Two governments have remained significantly silent, however—those of Burma’s two giant neighbors, China and India.
The reasons for their silence aren’t difficult to discern.
Both countries exploit Burma’s natural resources and are major trading partners. China, in particular, profits from lively arms sales to the pariah regime.
China makes no secret of its strong ties with Burma. New Delhi, on the other hand, is a pathetic hypocrite, changing its policy from support for Suu Kyi to one of subservience to Burma’s ruling generals. India has descended a long and ignoble decline since presenting Suu Kyi with its coveted Jawaharlal Nehru Award.
It’s sad indeed to see one of the world’s largest democracies—whose commitment to democracy has just been proved in a general election—kowtowing to the bullies of Naypyidaw.
It’s sad indeed to see one of the world’s largest democracies—whose commitment to democracy has just been proved in a general election—kowtowing to the bullies of Naypyidaw.
China’s stance on Burma is, by comparison, at least intriguing.
At the time of the September 2007 demonstrations, when monks and other protesters were gunned down in the streets of Rangoon, China told Burma to exercise restraint. Beijing urged the junta to restore order quickly and to address the domestic tensions that caused the unrest.
Although the regime ignored the appeals from Beijing, China remained on friendly terms with Naypidaw and used its UN veto to block a Security Council resolution on Burma in 2007.
Beijing is not blind, however, to Burma’s ongoing problems. Chinese analysts and officials have been meeting exiled Burmese and making assessments on Burma. They have suggested that Beijing is wary of political development in Burma.
China has also told the Burmese regime that it doesn’t share Naypyidaw’s description of Suu Kyi as a tool of the West, and has indicated strongly that it wants to see national reconciliation in Burma.
When Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi visited Burma in December, he urged junta leader Snr-Gen Than Shwe to respect the UN’s request for an inclusive political process in Burma, and he reportedly mentioned political prisoners, including Suu Kyi.
Informed sources in Naypyidaw suggested that Than Shwe looked unhappy, while briefing his Chinese visitor on the state of the country, including its political and economic development and reconstruction work in the cyclone-hit Irrawaddy delta.
It is sad that Burmese leaders have found in China a convenient shield to hide behind whenever they face international outrage and condemnation. Again, the silence emanating from Beijing only sent a wrong signal to Than Shwe.
As in September 2007, Beijing should speak out. But this time it should exercise its political influence not only on Burma but also on the region as a whole to press for the release of Suu Kyi and the other political prisoners.
Such a move by China would be warmly welcomed by oppressed Burmese and the exiled community. It shouldn’t be forgotten that they also want to regard China as a friend.

SAY NO TO 2010 ELECTION

From ‘People’s Army’ to ‘Enemy of the People'
(An article from Mizzima news)

by Tettoe Aung
Thursday, 26 March 2009 16:27

As Hegel said, “The only lesson we learn from history is that we do not learn from history.” One thing for sure, is that we Burmese have not learned from the proud history of our military. The founder of our military, Bogyoke Aung San, stated in unambiguous terms that the Burmese army (Tatmadaw) had not been founded for one man or one party, but rather for the whole country. He rejected the view of those military personnel who harbored the opinion that only they were capable of patriotism.Those that subscribed to the more narrow definition of patriotism branded people who dared to disagree with them as ‘axe handles’. If someone was married to a non-Burmese or a foreigner, like Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, he or she would be disowned.The military’s view that they are the only ones capable of patriotism is made explicit every March 27th, when they celebrate the once-called ‘Revolutionary Day’ as their exclusive ‘Armed Forces Day’. With the general public kept away from the ceremonies, it seems to have never occurred to them that there are others who are not soldiers who have suffered and made all kinds of sacrifices for their country.The irony is that the military, unlike celestial beings, are not born out of thin air. They are the offspring - sons and daughters - of the people whom they have chosen to turn against. Unlike the founding father, Bogyoke Aung San, the military under Ne Win and his successors, Saw Maung and now Than Shwe, has been indoctrinated to believe that they are above the people whom they are supposed to serve. For them, only the soldiers matter.As an article published in The Irrawaddy about the ‘military mindset’ noted, the underlining rationale in military training is to make a person immediately act or follow orders without thinking. There is no time for them to think whether their actions are right or wrong. Such a mentality was clearly on display in September 2007, as a young, Burmese soldier shot dead a Japanese cameraman at point blank range. And even if foot soldiers rise in rank to serve as officers or generals, still the lack of rational thought prevails.A study in ‘Killology’ by Colonel David Grossman shows that the training methods a military uses are brutalization, classical conditioning, operant conditioning and role-modeling. He writes: “Brutalization and desensitizing is what happens at the boot camp. From the moment you step off the bus you are physically and verbally abused. Your head is shaved, you are herded together naked, and dressed alike, losing all vestiges of individuality. This brutalization is designed to break down your existing mores and norms and to accept a new set of values which embrace destruction, violence and death as a way of life. In the end you are desensitized to violence and accept it as a normal and essential survival skill in your brutal new world.”When it comes to ‘classical conditioning’ Grossman says, “The Japanese were masters at using classical conditioning with their soldiers." Let us not forget the fact that the Burmese military was founded with the help of the Imperial Japanese military during the War. I recall how one of my relatives, trained to be an officer under the Japanese, himself became a Director of Training, incorporating similar methods of indoctrination to that of the Japanese. As for myself, I wasn't cut out for that and even my three month training at Phaung-gyi is something that I still feel disgusted about every time I recall the experience.The Burmese military may have been founded out of necessity as an institution, but reason says that institutions, the military included, are created to provide service for humanity, not to advance the personal interests of those mandated to serve. In the same vein, Zhuge Liang wrote, “When offices are chosen for persons, there is disorder; when persons are chosen for offices, there is order.”Yet, the Tatmadaw will continue to parade on March 27th of this year just as they always do, marching merely for themselves and not, as it should be, for the people.

Lawless country and barbarious rulers

Security force member: "You are under arrest because you have changed the contents of our three main causes."
Lady in front of the signboard: "I do not change it. Maybe someone rewrite it. Can't I read it?"

Security force member: "No, no. You are under arrest because you are reading what is not an official motto of our military government. "

OBAMA ON BURMESE MILY. REGIME

"TO THOSE WHO CLING TO POWER THROUGH CORRUPTION AND DECEIT AND THE SILENCING OF DISSENT, KNOW THAT YOU ARE ON THE WRONG SIDE OF HISTORY, BUT THAT WE WILL EXTEND A HAND IF YOU ARE WILLING TO UNCLENCH YOUR FIST."

RESULT OF THE LAST ELECTION

NEW YEAR (2009) RESOLUTION

First, through a concerted, non-violent protest by all citizens of the country at home and international fora. If it is responded by repression and harsher measures, then, through an armed revolution. Such moves are sure to be supported by all democratic and peace loving countries of the world. (modest)

EXIT 2008 ENTER 2009

Exit 2008 without any fruitful result for Burma. The world body cannot do anything to get rid of the military regime in Burma. Nor the people and religious monks who had taken to streets in September 2007. Another bloodshed in the troubled country and many more to come in the near future. The new year 2009 ushered in but the country is still under the boots of merciless military regime. Run by a handful of top brass, the country is still in the list of poorest countries of the world. However, by robbing, bribing and confiscating properties of people the ruling generals have turned themselves into billioners overnight. While the top generals are accumulating their wealth when time is ripe and during power is in their hands, poor people become poorer than before. Now the unscrupulous group and criminals of the century again preparing for the next election which is to be held in 2010 nationwide. Another cheating game. People have enough bluffing stories and they are undoubtedly fed up of going to the poll stations if the elections is going to take place as scheduled by the regime. They believe that only the army will going to take power again whoever win the coming elections and nothing will be changed for the country and people. The military regime has tried every means and ways to erase the internationally recognized election result of 1990. It even attempted to assassinate the democratic icon Daw Aung San Suu Kyi. It hamper party activities of NLD that are in accordance with the rule of National Election Commission. The regime arrested hundreds of protester who participated in the Saffron Revolution that took place in September 2007. Many are sentenced up to 60 years meaning that they are going to rule for the next 60 years. Are they going to rule?

Former World Leaders Rally for Burma’s Political Prisoners,
Call for UN Action

(OSI News Coverage: December 3, 2008)

In recent weeks, the Burmese military has sentenced over 200 students and labor activists, Cyclone Nargis relief workers, monks—and even their lawyers—to draconian prison terms. The venerable U Gambira, a leading monk of last year’s popular protests, was sentenced to 68 years.

The Soros foundations network partnered with grantees and the Oslo Center for Peace and Human Rights and Freedom to garner presidential signatures calling for the release of Aung San Suu Kyi and all political prisoners currently being held by Burma’s junta. Over 100 former presidents and prime ministers representing more than 50 countries wrote to the United Nations Secretary General, Ban Ki-moon: “If the Burmese junta continues to defy the United Nations by refusing to make these releases by the end of the year, we urge you to encourage the Security Council to take further concrete action to implement its call for the release of all political prisoners.

Letter to UNSG

Mr. Ban Ki-moon
Secretary-General
United Nations
New York, New York

Dear Mr. Secretary-General:

We write this letter to applaud your public consideration of traveling to Burma, also known as Myanmar, before the end of the year. We encourage this trip because it would illustrate for the world whether or not the Burmese military regime is serious about making changes called for by the United Nations Security Council and your good offices.
As you are aware, on October 11, 2007, the United Nations Security Council issued a presidential statement calling on the Burmese military junta to release all political prisoners in Burma, including the world’s only imprisoned Nobel Peace Prize Laureate, Aung San Suu Kyi.
We are heartened that you have taken up this issue and reiterated in your budget request for your Special Envoy's office to the UN General Assembly that a key benchmark to measure progress in Burma is whether all political prisoners in Burma, including Aung San Suu Kyi, are released by December 31, 2008. To date, in direct defiance of the United Nations Security Council and your good offices, the Burmese military junta has instead continued a major crackdown, increasing the number of political prisoners from 1,200 to over 2,100 since June 2007.
We urge you to make it clear that all political prisoners in Burma must be released by the end of this year, regardless of whether you travel to Burma. If the Burmese junta continues to defy the United Nations by refusing to make these releases by the end of the year, we urge you to encourage the Security Council to take further concrete action to implement its call for the release of all political prisoners. The Burmese people are counting on the United Nations to take the required action to achieve the breakthrough they desperately need to both restore democracy to their country and address the serious humanitarian and human rights challenges that they face.

Sincerely,

1. The Honorable Giuliano Amato
Former Prime Minister of Italy (1992–1993, 2000-2001)

2. The Honorable Halldór Ásgrímsson
Former Prime Minister of Iceland (2004-2006)

3. The Honorable Corazon C. Aquino
Former President of the Philippines (1986-1992)

4. The Honorable Patricio Aylwin Azócar
Former President of Chile (1990-1994)

5. The Honorable Hrant Bagratyan
Former Prime Minister of Armenia (1991, 1993-1996)

6. The Honorable Jan Krzysztof Bielecki
Former Prime Minister of Poland (1991)

7. The Honorable Valdis Birkavs
Former Prime Minister of Latvia (1993-1994)

8. The Right Honourable Tony Blair
Former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (1997-2007)

9. The Honorable Kjell Magne Bondevik
Former Prime Minister of Norway (1997-2000, 2001-2005)

10. The Honorable George H.W. Bush
Former President of the United States of America (1989-1993)

11. The Right Honourable Kim Campbell
Former Prime Minister of Canada (1993)

12. The Honorable Ján Čarnogurský
Former Prime Minister of the Slovak Republic (1991-1992)

13. The Honorable Fernando Henrique Cardoso
Former President of Brazil (1995-2003)

14. The Honorable Ingvar Carlsson
Former Prime Minister of Sweden (1986-1991, 1994-1996)

15. The Honorable Jimmy Carter
Former President of the United States of America (1977-1981)

16. The Honorable Joaquim Chissano (1986-2005)
Former President of Mozambique

17. The Honorable Carlo Azelio Ciampi
Former President of Italy (1999-2006)
Former Prime Minister of Italy (1993-1994)
Senator for Life (2006-Present)

18. The Honorable Włodzimierz Cimoszewicz
Former Prime Minister of Poland (1996-1997)

19. The Honorable Emil Constantinescu
Former President of Romania (1996-2000)

20. The Honorable Roberto Dañino
Former Prime Minister of Peru (2001-2002)

21. The Honorable Joseph Deiss
Former President of Switzerland (1994)

22. The Honorable Philip Dimitrov
Former Prime Minister of Bulgaria (1991-1992)

23. The Honorable Abdou Diouf
Former President of Senegal (1981-2000)

24. The Honorable Jacques Delors
Former President of the European Commission (1985-1995)

25. The Honorable Mikuláš Dzurinda
Former Prime Minister of the Slovak Republic (1998-2006)

26. The Honorable Elbegdorj Tsakhiagiin
Former Prime Minister of Mongolia (1998, 2004-2006)

27. The Honorable José María Figueres
Former President of Costa Rica (1994-1998)

28. The Honorable Vigdís Finnbogadóttir
Former President of Iceland (1980-1996)

29. The Honorable Vicente Fox
Former President of Mexico (2000-2006)

30. The Honorable César Gaviria
Former President of Colombia (1990-1994)

31. The Honorable Eugenijus Gentvilas
Former Prime Minister of Lithuania (2001)

32. The Honorable Árpád Göncz
Former President of Hungary (1990-2000)

33. The Honorable Mikhail Gorbachev
Former President of the Soviet Union (1990-1991)

34. The Honorable Inder Kumar Gujral
Former Prime Minister of India (1997-1998)

35. The Honorable Václav Havel
Former President of the Czech Republic (1990-2003)

36. The Right Honourable John Howard AC
Former Prime Minister of Australia (1996-2007)

37. The Honorable Anneli Jäätteenmäki
Former Prime Minister of Finland (2003)

38. The Honorable Thorbjørn Jagland
Former Prime Minister of Norway (1996-1997)

39. The Honorable Lionel Jospin
Former Prime Minister of France (1997-2002)

40. The Honorable Kim Dae-jung
Former President of South Korea (1998-2003)

41. The Honorable Ricardo Froilán Lagos Escobar
Former President of Chile (2000-2006)

42. The Right Honourable Malcolm Fraser AC CH
Former Prime Minister of Australia (1975-1983)

43. The Honorable Osvaldo Hurtado
Former President of Ecuador (1981-1984)

44. The Honorable Jarosław Kaczyński
Former Prime Minister of Poland (2006-2007)

45. The Honorable Girija Prasad Koirala
Former Prime Minister of Nepal (1991-1994, 1998-1999, 2000-2001, 2006-2008)

46. The Honorable Junichiro Koizumi
Former Prime Minister of Japan (2001-2006)

47. The Honorable Wim Kok
Prime Minister of the Netherlands (1994-2002)

48. The Honorable Ivan Kostov
Former Prime Minister of Bulgaria (1997-2001)

49. The Honorable Milan Kucan
Former President of Slovenia (1990-2002)

50. The Honorable Vytautas Landsbergis
Former President of Lithuania (1990-1992)

51. The Honorable Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga
Former President of Sri Lanka (1994-2005)
Former Prime Minister of Sri Lanka (1994)

52. The Honorable Aleksander Kwaśniewski
Former President of Poland (1995-2005)

53. The Honorable Mart Laar
Former Prime Minister of Estonia (1992-1994, 1999-2002)

54. The Honorable Zlatko Lagumdžija
Former Prime Minister of Bosnia and Herzegovina (2001-2002)

55. The Honorable Lee Hae Chan
Former Prime Minister of South Korea (2004-2006)

56. The Honorable Lee Hong-Koo
Former Prime Minister of South Korea (1994-1995)

57. The Honorable Ruud Lubbers
Former Prime Minister of The Netherlands (1982-1994)

58. The Honorable Ferenc Mádl
Former President of Hungary (2000-2005)

59. The Right Honourable Paul Martin
Former Prime Minister of Canada (2003-2006)

60. The Honorable Pandeli Majko
Former Prime Minister of Albania (1998-1999, 2002)

61. The Right Honourable Sir John Major, KG CH PC
Former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (1990-1997)

62. The Honorable Tadeusz Mazowiecki
Former Prime Minister of Poland (1989-1991)

63. The Honorable Péter Medgyessy
Former Prime Minister of Hungary (2002-2004)

64. The Honorable Rexhep Meidani
Former President of Albania (1997-2002)

65. The Honorable Aleksandër Gabriel Meksi
Former Prime Minister of Albania (1992-1997)

66. The Honorable Ilir Meta
Former Prime Minister of Albania (1999-2002)

67. The Honorable Konstantinos Mitsotakis
Former Prime Minister of Greece (1990-1993)

68. The Honorable Benjamin Mkapa
Former President of Tanzania (1995-2005)

69. The Honorable Alfred Spiro Moisiu Former President of Albania (2002-2007)

70. The Honorable António Manuel Mascarenhas Monteiro
Former President of Cape Verde (1991-2001)

71. The Honorable Mike Moore
Former Prime Minister of New Zealand (1990)

72. The Right Honourable Brian Mulroney
Former Prime Minister of Canada (1984-1993)

73. The Honorable Fatos Thanas Nano
Former Prime Minister of Albania (1991, 1997-1998, 2002-2005)

74. The Honorable Odvar Nordli
Former Prime Minister of Norway (1976-1981)

75. The Honorable Davíð Oddsson
Former Prime Minister of Iceland (1991-2004)

76. The Honorable Karl Auguste Offmann
Former President of Mauritius (2002-2003)

77. The Honorable Viktor Orbán
Former Prime Minister of Hungary (1998-2002)

78. The Honorable Andres Pastrana Former President of Colombia (1998-2002)

79. The Honorable Göran Persson
Former Prime Minister of Sweden (1996-2006)

80. The Honorable Lojze Peterle
Former Prime Minister of Slovenia (1990-1992)

81. The Honorable Petr Pithart
Former Prime Minister of the Czech Republic (1990-1992)

82. The Honorable Romano Prodi
Former Prime Minister of Italy (1996-1998, 2006-2008)
Former President of the European Commission (1999-2004)

83. The Honorable Fidel V. Ramos
Former President of the Philippines (1992-1998)

84. The Honorable Eduardo Frei Ruiz-Tagle
Former President of Chile (1994-2000)
Senator for Life (2000-Present)

85. The Honorable Konstantinos Simitis
Former Prime Minister of Greece (1996-2004)

86. The Honorable Konstantinos Stephanopoulos
Former President of Greece (1995-2005)

87. The Honorable José Ramos-Horta
Former Prime Minister of Timor-Leste (2006-2007)
President of Timor-Leste (2008-Present)

88. The Honorable Poul Nyrup Rasmussen
Former Prime Minister of Denmark (1993-2001)

89. The Honorable Mary Robinson
Former President of Ireland (1990-1997)

90. The Honorable Roh Moo-Hyun
Former President of South Korea (2003-2008)

91. The Honorable Arnold Rüütel
Former President of Estonia (2001-2006)

92. The Honorable Michel Rocard
Former Prime Minister of France (1988-1991)

93. The Honorable Eduardo Rodríguez Veltzé
Former President of the Republic of Bolivia (2005-2006)

94. The Honorable Gonzalo Sánchez de Lozada
Former President of Bolivia (1993-1997, 2002-2003)

95. The Honorable Amos Claudius Sawyer
Former President of Liberia (1990-1994)

96. The Honorable Jennifer Shipley
Former Prime Minister of New Zealand (1997-1999)

97. The Honorable Vladimír Špidla
Former Prime Minister of the Czech Republic (2002-2004)

98. The Honorable Levon Ter-Petrossian
Former President of Armenia (1991-1998)

99. The Honorable Malam Bacai Sanhá
Former President of Guinea-Bissau (1999-2000)

100. The Honorable Petar Stoyanov
Former President of Bulgaria (1997-2002)

101. The Honorable Andres Tarand
Former Prime Minister of Estonia (1994-1995)

102. The Right Honourable Baroness Thatcher of Kesteven
Former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (1979-1990)

103. The Honorable Alejandro Toledo
Former President of Peru (2001-2006)

104. The Honorable Ung Huot
Former Prime Minister of Cambodia (1997-1998)

105. The Honorable Cassam Uteem
Former President of Mauritius (1992-2002)

106. The Honorable Vaira Vīķe-Freiberga
Former President of Latvia (1999-2007)

107. The Honorable Richard von Weizsäcker
Former President of Germany (1984-1994)

108. The Honorable Abdurrahman Wahid
Former President of Indonesia (1991-2001)

109. The Honorable Lech Wałęsa
Former President of Poland (1990-1995)

110. The Honorable Kåre Willoch
Former Prime Minister of Norway (1981-1986)

111. The Honorable Albert Zafy
Former President of Madagascar (1993-1996)

112. The Honorable Ernesto Zedillo
Former President of Mexico (1994-2000)

FOR WHOM THE AID COMES IN

The victims of the cyclone Nargis in the delta region, Lower Burma are facing problems of lack of food, water, shelter and clothing. They do not receive aid materials sufficiently. Neither do they get treatment for cyclone-borne injury. Also they are suffering from disease relevant to contaminated water resulted from delaying of removing and destruction of the human corpses and dead animals. Although it is desperately needed to save the people, to cleanse the water by removing dead bodies – or it may effect harmfully the environment – to distribute relief materials from both national and international communities to the victims, the Junta is deliberately disturbing local aid volunteers and blocking international relieve experts.

Not only that Burmese Junta is trying to delay the process of receiving international aid and aid workers, but also that China is opposing in the UN Security Council Meeting against the plan to invade Burma to distribute necessary aid to victims effectively. Whereas, China received international aid for their victims of recent earthquake that shook in Sichuan Province, central China, only one week after the cyclone Nargis. We are wondering why China is trying to hamper the world’s humanitarian effort towards Burmese people who are under horrendous catastrophic disaster. Why are they supporting inhuman military Government without any regard, any sympathy and any empathy to the Burmese people? What is benefit to them for such evil doing? It is humiliation to our people. Also I think it is a criminal. Yet they are not shy in the face of international community.

Now we have learnt that relief teams from the UN, US, Britain and France are standing by in the Thailand water that shares border with Burmese territorial water. They are waiting for permission to enter Burmese water. In such a situation of catastrophic disaster, does it necessary to get permission from such useless and illegal Government, the Junta? I think saving peoples’ life is more important than the Junta’s approval.

Is the UN a nominal organization without practical work? Is it not a trusty-worthy and dependable organization for all people of the world? In stead of being an organization to observe justice among member countries and to assist necessarily with humanitarian aid to all people of the world, it is now just hesitating and wavering to walk along the right way. The UN and international community are negotiating with Burmese authority – just time consuming – to save the people while the death toll increasing day by day due to lack adequate aid materials. Useless organization!

Objection by China in the UN Security Council Meeting against such a humanitarian relief effort is shameful. Its donation to Burma is just a couple of million US$ worth; a paltry sum; at near base in the donation graph. Why do they want to interfere into other country’s internal affair which does not concern with politics? All of our people except the malignant Junta and its colleagues want invasion of the US, the UN and international community into the country to save victims.

They always use the word “internal affair” over Burmese issue. This is just a pure internal and humanitarian affair. Why did they object the international relief efforts for Burmese catastrophe while accepting donation from abroad for their earthquake disaster? Ridiculous! Two situations are completely contrary. This is Chinese policy revealing low morality, low attitude of it. We accuse the Chinese Government of killing our people together with Burmese slaughter Generals. The Chinese Government also must pay back later for it a lot like Than Shwe and his followers. Who can say there will not be a overwhelm boycott of the world to their 2008 Olympic? This will be under nature’s process. Bad deed begets misery and ruins.

Now, it was more than two weeks away that the cyclone Nargis hit the Delta region. Since then, a considerable amount of relief aid from abroad could not arrive at the hands of the victims. Victim’s situation is deteriorating; more and more people will die under insignificant change of international relief policy. Death toll will, according to the UN and other organizations’ prediction, swell over 220,000 – more than that of Bangladesh cyclone that hit in 1991 losing just over 138,000 lives – and it is the worst devastating situation in Burmese history.

We, Burmese people, ask international community for urgent relief efforts including relief experts and workers to enter Burma so that they can distribute necessary aids effectively and save our people from extremely dangerous situation resulting from a lack of food, clean water, proper treatment, medicine, shelter and clothing. Otherwise, great tragedy will happen in this civilized world because of irrational beings, the Burmese Junta.

Shwe Sea Sar (Yangon)

(COURTESY OF DR. LUN SWE IN MAE SOT, THAILAND)

"The downpour is ours"

The first cut of the monetary donations go to the military junta and the Army members received the second cut. The third cut is for cronies of the junta. How much do you think the survivors of the Nargis Cyclone get? The cartoon shows the donation which is meant for them has been robbed by the junta and its followers.

REFERENDUM BEFORE RELIEF

The paranoid military regime in Burma is going too far and degrade itself again by revealing its true nature. This time the military thieves irresponsibly ignore the survivors of Nargis Cyclone and shamelessly collecting ballots from people in the light of people mourning for victims of the castastrophe. To make it worst, in some locations the axe handles (cronies of the regime such as Kyantphut and Sunareshin members) are using force to obtain "Yes" vote to the ridiculous constitution drawn by the regime. They even beat and threaten the people who are reluctantly giving votes to them in the time of mourning for the death of thousands of people whose lives were taken away by the recent cyclone. The authorities also robbed the relief aids that was given by foreign organizations. They hoard the relief goods in the warehouses of military units and later distributed to Army members. Quality and nutritous food go to Tamadaw members and for the survivors of cyclone the authorities provide unqualified local food. manufactured by the government factories, to the survivors who are mostly farmers by profession. These farmers are paddy growers of the delta and the rice have to be handed over to the government depots after the harvest. Then the junta exports to foreign countries in order to get hard money. Finally, all the profits went into the pockets of top brass. As a gesture of gratitude to the farmers the junta is refusing most external aids that is meant for the survivors. The junta also ban journalists and relief aid workers to go to the cyclon-affected areas. It is ridiculous that donors inside as well as outside have to plead the regime in order that their relief goods go through. Worst of all, the UN is calling for an emergency meeting to make convince the mily. government for accepting the aids that are flowing in from many countries. The regime does not care about the people. What they care is only for their own interests and to stay long in power. They are regarding their own people as enemies because people have demanded freedom and human rights in last September. The regime responded them with bullets and many people, including students and monks were crushed down in the Saffron Movement. With the firm backing of Chinese government, the military regime is running amok and creating chaos and killing fields in the midst of pleading by the UN and international community. All the leaders of resistance movements are now in the prison and the opposition leader is under house arrest. What can people do now? They would not risk their lives as they believe nothing will be changed. As China becomes one of her important economic allies, the United States can only pay lip services in supporting Burmese people who are in distress. Also what can the UN do? Nothing more than passing a resolution (like previous years) that cannot remove the regime that gives trouble not only to its own country but also to the regions. The military junta will never pay attention to the UN or international community. Unless Burmese people cannot remove the military junta by themselves (as nobody from outside is going to help effectively) let the devil continue ruling the country until the entire nation faces the utter destruction.